Martin Stühmer

Who I Am

I’m Martin, CTO at Integrated Worlds GmbH in the Stuttgart region. I’ve been building .NET systems for nearly 20 years—since Framework 2.0 when SOAP was cutting-edge and ORMs were controversial.

Today I lead technology strategy for cloud-native solutions on Azure. Before this, I was Director Consulting Services at CGI, working with enterprise teams on architecture and transformation. I’m a Microsoft Certified Trainer and IHK-certified instructor, and I maintain several open-source NuGet packages.

What I Do

As CTO, I don’t just make decisions from a distance. I write code, review PRs, debug production issues, and mentor teams. Technology leadership means staying hands-on and feeling the consequences of your choices.

As a trainer and mentor, I focus on fundamentals that outlast framework hype. Static analyzers, testing strategies, performance patterns, maintainable architecture—the stuff that actually prevents production fires.

As an open-source maintainer, I publish packages that solve problems I’ve hit repeatedly in real systems. When strangers depend on your code, you write better tests and clearer docs.

What I’ve Learned

Almost two decades means I’ve made every mistake: over-engineered systems, bet on Silverlight and WCF (oops), built “flexible” architectures that were just complicated, shipped code I’m not proud of.

Here’s what stuck:

Quality isn’t optional – Analyzers catch bugs in milliseconds, tests prevent regressions, and both are faster than firefighting
Fundamentals outlast frameworks – Patterns and principles survive; specific tools don’t always
Context beats dogma – “Best practices” depend on your team, domain, and constraints
Evidence beats opinion – Measure, benchmark, validate before deciding
Pragmatism wins – Good-enough architecture that ships beats perfect architecture that doesn’t

What I Write About

I share perspectives from production systems and real teams. I’m skeptical of buzzword-driven development and allergic to cargo-cult practices. If a trend lacks substance or a pattern doesn’t hold up under pressure, I’ll say so.

This blog is for developers, solution architects and operators who maintain production systems and care about quality, not just shipping fast.

Published blogs

Audit Logging That Survives Your Next Security Incident

Your audit logs probably won’t survive a real security incident. Most implementations log too much, protect too little, and provide zero value when something breaks at 2 AM. Here’s how to fix that with structured logging that actually works.

Your [Authorize] Attribute Is Compliance Theater

Your [Authorize] attributes give you a false sense of security. ISO 27001 auditors see right through it.

I’ve reviewed dozens of ASP.NET Core apps that authenticate flawlessly — then scatter role strings across business logic, skip audit logs, and wonder why they fail compliance. Here’s the pattern that kills audits, and how to actually fix it.

Why ISO Standards Actually Matter for .NET Developers

Cloud-native .NET development has transformed ISO/IEC 27001, 27017, and 27701 from abstract compliance requirements into concrete daily coding decisions. This guide shows .NET developers how security standards directly map to Azure Key Vault integration, Azure AD authentication, and proper logging—with real code examples demonstrating compliant vs. non-compliant implementations.

Real Professional Software Engineering in the AI Era

Throughout this series, we’ve established that AI-generated code without understanding creates productivity illusions that collapse in production (Part 1), and that the feedback loop between code and reality—compilation, testing, profiling, production—sharpens thinking in ways AI can’t replicate (Part 2). Now we confront the practical question: What defines professional software engineering when code generation becomes trivial? This final part examines the irreplaceable skillset: understanding execution characteristics (recognizing allocation patterns that cause GC pressure before deployment), asking questions AI can’t formulate (What’s the failure mode when this service is unavailable?), recognizing when plausible AI solutions diverge from correct ones, debugging production failures AI has no execution model to reason about, and evaluating maintainability for code that becomes tomorrow’s burden. We explore why prompt engineering optimizes for speed while architecture optimizes for survival, why “AI productivity” often means faster technical debt accumulation, and why the economic reality favors organizations that measure system reliability over lines of code generated. The feedback loop can’t be automated because closing it requires learning from production failures and applying that knowledge to prevent future ones—the irreplaceable discipline that defines real professionals in 2026 and beyond.

Stoßlüften: The Architecture of Intentional Resets

A Swabian habit teaches a DevOps lesson: open windows fully and often, or invisible decay accumulates. Stoßlüften isn’t about comfort—it’s about forcing systems to prove they’re healthy. Regular restarts, infrastructure-as-code, and reproducibility checks catch the problems that green metrics miss.