Security & Compliance Engineering

Compliance is not a separate activity from software development. It is engineering discipline codified into standards, controls, and measurable requirements. For .NET developers, compliance means understanding how architectural decisions—authentication mechanisms, logging strategies, error handling, secrets management—directly determine whether your system satisfies audit requirements or violates them.

The traditional model separated developers from compliance. Security teams defined policies while developers wrote code without understanding how those policies connected to actual implementation. That separation collapses in cloud-native environments where developers control infrastructure, define access patterns, and manage sensitive data through code.

Compliance as Engineering Practice

Regulatory frameworks like GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI-DSS are increasingly translated into technical standards. ISO/IEC standards bridge that gap by specifying control requirements in terms that technical teams can implement, test, and verify. Developers who understand these standards build systems that satisfy compliance requirements by default.

Audit Logging That Survives Your Next Security Incident

Audit Logging That Survives Your Next Security Incident

Your audit logs probably won’t survive a real security incident. Most implementations log too much, protect too little, and provide zero value when something breaks at 2 AM. Here’s how to fix that with structured logging that actually works.
Why ISO Standards Actually Matter for .NET Developers

Why ISO Standards Actually Matter for .NET Developers

Cloud-native .NET development has transformed ISO/IEC 27001, 27017, and 27701 from abstract compliance requirements into concrete daily coding decisions. This guide shows .NET developers how security standards directly map to Azure Key Vault integration, Azure AD authentication, and proper logging—with real code examples demonstrating compliant vs. non-compliant implementations.