C# Programming Language Articles

C# is Microsoft’s modern, statically-typed language for .NET development. This collection explores C# features, language evolution, practical patterns, and techniques for writing clear, efficient code in the C# ecosystem.

Language Evolution and Features

C# has evolved significantly since its creation, adopting features from other languages and innovating independently. Modern C# (10+) includes records for immutable types, nullable reference types for null-safety, pattern matching for elegant code flow, and async/await for asynchronous programming.

Records provide concise syntax for immutable data types with structural equality, ideal for domain models and data transfer objects.

Nullable Reference Types make null-safety explicit at compile time, preventing the infamous “billion-dollar mistake” of null reference exceptions.

Pattern Matching enables elegant code for type checking, null checking, and property matching without verbose if-else chains.

Async/Await abstracts the complexity of asynchronous programming, enabling responsive applications without callback hell.

Practical C# Development

Articles in this section cover language features, effective C# patterns, performance optimization, LINQ mastery, and integration with .NET libraries. Topics include null handling strategies, immutability patterns, error handling approaches, and leveraging type system features.

The goal is writing C# code that’s not just correct but also expressive, maintainable, and performant—code that communicates intent clearly and resists bugs through type safety and language features.

Configuration-First Health Checks for Modern .NET

Configuration-First Health Checks for Modern .NET

Let’s be honest: health checks are the broccoli of .NET projects. Everyone says they have them, but nobody’s excited to eat their greens. What starts as a humble SELECT 1 in a try/catch quickly explodes into a wild jungle of scripts, copy-pasted connection strings, and endpoints that only half the team remembers. Sure, it works—until it doesn’t. And when it breaks, it’s never at a good time.

Stop Parsing the Same String Twice: CompositeFormat in .NET

Stop Parsing the Same String Twice: CompositeFormat in .NET

Every time you call string.Format() with the same format string, .NET parses it again. And again. And again. CompositeFormat changes that: parse once, reuse forever. The result? Up to 30% faster formatting, fewer allocations, and a one-line code change. Here’s why this matters and how to use it.
How SearchValues Saved Us From Scaling Hell

How SearchValues<T> Saved Us From Scaling Hell

While you’re busy optimizing database queries and adding cache layers, thousands of string searches per second are quietly eating your CPU budget. The problem isn’t visible in your APM dashboard because it’s distributed across every request. But it’s there. Compounding. Scaling linearly with load.

I discovered this the hard way when a log processing API started choking under production traffic. The bottleneck? String validation and sanitization. The fix? A .NET 8 feature that delivered a 5x performance improvement and let us shut down servers instead of adding them. And it’s gotten even better in .NET 9 and 10.

Clean Code: A Lip Service, Not a Standard

Clean Code: A Lip Service, Not a Standard

Clean Code is often praised but rarely practiced effectively. This article explores how misunderstood ideals and over-engineering harm .NET systems, how to recognize such failures early, and which C# best practices and official guidelines truly support maintainable software.
ConstantExpectedAttribute: Unlocking Performance Through Compiler Awareness

ConstantExpectedAttribute: Unlocking Performance Through Compiler Awareness

The ConstantExpectedAttribute, introduced in .NET 7, provides a powerful mechanism to signal compiler expectations about constant values. This enables better performance optimizations, enhanced IDE tooling, and clearer API contracts. Learn how to leverage this attribute to build more efficient and maintainable .NET applications.
Still Waiting for the Final Piece: When C# 14 Comes Close, But Not Quite There

Still Waiting for the Final Piece: When C# 14 Comes Close, But Not Quite There

C# 14 introduces the new ‘Extension Everything’ syntax—an elegant step toward more expressive code, yet one that still can’t quite match VB.NET’s classic ByRef magic. A humorous reflection on what’s almost, but not fully, possible in .NET 10.
.NET 10 RC 1 is Knocking at the Door: Architectural Impact, C# 14, and Performance

.NET 10 RC 1 is Knocking at the Door: Architectural Impact, C# 14, and Performance

.NET 10 RC 1 is knocking at the door, marking the first release candidate and offering the .NET community a detailed preview of what’s to come in the next LTS cycle. While not the final release, RC 1 is “go-live” supported and represents the feature-complete platform that will soon become .NET 10 LTS. In this article, I’ll try to give a rough overview of the architectural impact of .NET 10 RC 1, focusing on the latest C# 14 features, under-the-hood performance improvements, and strategic considerations for the upcoming LTS.

Visual Studio 2026 - Why AI-Native Tooling Will Matter

Visual Studio 2026 - Why AI-Native Tooling Will Matter

Let’s skip the typical release-cycle enthusiasm for a second: Most IDE updates come and go. New features, some refactoring helpers, a bit of polish, then back to business as usual. Visual Studio 2026 is different. For once, the promise of “AI-native” isn’t just marketing. If Microsoft lands even half of what they’re previewing, it’s going to matter—a lot.

Buzzword-Driven Development vs. Fundamental Software Quality

Buzzword-Driven Development vs. Fundamental Software Quality

Explore why fundamental software quality practices in .NET must never be overlooked for trendy buzzwords, including recommended analyzers and project settings for managing technical debt effectively.
Vibe Coding in .NET: Creative Catalyst or Maintenance Risk?

Vibe Coding in .NET: Creative Catalyst or Maintenance Risk?

In the world of software development, there’s a recurring tension between discipline and improvisation. Somewhere along that spectrum lies a phenomenon increasingly referred to as Vibe Coding. The term evokes a style of development where engineers follow intuition and momentum rather than formal plans, processes, or design patterns.

It’s fast, fluid, and occasionally brilliant. But is it sustainable in a .NET-based enterprise context?

Understanding the C# `StringValues`: A Comprehensive Guide

Understanding the C# `StringValues`: A Comprehensive Guide

In C#, the StringValues struct belongs to the Microsoft.Extensions.Primitives namespace, which is widely used in modern .NET applications. This struct plays a crucial role in efficiently managing string collections, especially when handling efficiently, particularly in contexts where multiple strings are involved. In this blog post, we’ll explore the purpose, usage, and key features of the StringValues struct in C#.

Managing Errors, Warnings, and Configurations in C# and .NET

Managing Errors, Warnings, and Configurations in C# and .NET

When we activated static code analysis for the first time in one of my last projects, the overwhelming number of warnings exceeded expectations and highlighted gaps in the code. Without making any changes, the project already had a significant number of warnings. After activating additional analyzers and updating some configurations, this number temporarily increased dramatically.

The high number of warnings was initially daunting, but we saw it as an opportunity to significantly improve our code quality. At first glance, it seemed easier to suppress or ignore these warnings. But as I often remind my team, “The code you create is a valuable legacy, so it’s important to build it carefully.” Ignoring warnings today creates obstacles for future developers—and that could very well include you six months down the line.

This experience reinforced the importance of managing warnings and errors systematically. Let me share some of the lessons we learned, the strategies we used to tame those 60,000 warnings, and how you can apply these techniques to your own projects.