AI Code Assistant Tools and Techniques

AI-powered code assistants have fundamentally changed how developers approach coding tasks, from boilerplate generation to complex problem-solving. This collection explores how tools like GitHub Copilot, Claude, and other AI models are integrated into development workflows, their strengths and limitations, and best practices for using them effectively.

Productivity and Learning

AI assistants excel at generating boilerplate code, completing repetitive patterns, and suggesting implementations for common problems. However, their effectiveness depends heavily on how developers use them—as tools to accelerate focus work or as shortcuts that circumvent learning.

The key question isn’t whether to use AI assistants, but how to use them as force multipliers without becoming dependent on generated code you don’t understand. Effective developers leverage AI for speed while remaining critically engaged with the output.

Integration and Workflows

Articles in this section cover practical integration of AI assistants into IDEs, command-line workflows, and team processes. Topics include prompt engineering for better suggestions, understanding when AI-assisted code requires extra scrutiny, and maintaining code quality standards while adopting AI tools.

The focus is on pragmatic adoption: understanding capabilities, recognizing limitations, and making informed decisions about where AI assistance genuinely accelerates development versus where it creates technical debt or security risks.

Why Real Professionals Will Never Be Replaced by AI

Why Real Professionals Will Never Be Replaced by AI

The elephant everyone ignores: AI can generate code faster than you can type. GitHub Copilot autocompletes entire functions. ChatGPT builds APIs from prompts. Typing is dead. So why will real professionals never be replaced? Because “vibe coding”—describe what you want, ship what AI generates—is a productivity illusion that collapses spectacularly in production. When code generation becomes trivial, understanding what that code costs, where it fails, why it breaks under load becomes everything. AI generates syntax. Professionals understand execution, failure modes, operational cost, and production consequences. The differentiator isn’t typing speed—it’s mastering the feedback loop: write code, watch it fail, understand why, refine thinking. This discipline can’t be automated. Prompt engineers generate code. Real professionals ensure it survives contact with reality.
Buzzword-Driven Development vs. Fundamental Software Quality

Buzzword-Driven Development vs. Fundamental Software Quality

Explore why fundamental software quality practices in .NET must never be overlooked for trendy buzzwords, including recommended analyzers and project settings for managing technical debt effectively.
Instruction by Design: Transforming ADRs into Actionable AI Guidance

Instruction by Design: Transforming ADRs into Actionable AI Guidance

Discover how to transform architectural decision records (ADRs) into actionable, AI-ready guidance for teams and copilots—boosting consistency, onboarding, and automation in your development workflow.
How to Use Copilot Without Becoming Its Puppet

How to Use Copilot Without Becoming Its Puppet

In a previous article, we laid it out – unfiltered: Copilot turns junior devs into syntax secretaries.

Not because it’s evil. But because it removes friction before understanding.

It gives you working code before you know what working even means. It creates the illusion of progress, while slowly eroding the very skills that define a software engineer: reasoning, decision-making, and technical ownership.

Copilot Turns Junior Devs Into Syntax Secretaries

Copilot Turns Junior Devs Into Syntax Secretaries

The hype around GitHub Copilot (or any other AI code assistant) is deafening. AI-assisted coding. Effortless automation. 10x productivity.

But here’s the harsh truth: Copilot isn’t empowering junior developers – it’s deskilling them.