Instruction by Design: Transforming ADRs into Actionable AI Guidance

Instruction by Design: Transforming ADRs into Actionable AI Guidance

Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) capture the “why” behind your technical choices—documenting decisions, rationale, and context for future reference. They should guide teams through complex landscapes, inform new decisions, and provide clarity during audits or onboarding.

But here’s the problem: Most ADRs become digital dust collectors.

They sit in repositories, referenced only during crisis meetings or compliance audits. Developers bypass them during daily work, and automation tools ignore them completely. The gap between architectural intent and daily practice grows wider every sprint.

The Core Challenge

Traditional ADRs are passive documentation—they record what happened, but don’t actively shape what happens next:

  • Discovery friction: New team members must hunt through scattered documents to understand current standards
  • Enforcement gaps: Build systems and linters operate independently of architectural decisions
  • Consistency drift: Without active reinforcement, even well-documented standards gradually erode across teams

The Vision: ADRs That Actually Work

Imagine ADRs that don’t just document decisions—they drive them:

  • Every architectural choice directly influences code suggestions from AI Code Assistant
  • New developers instantly understand current standards through integrated guidance
  • Automation systems enforce architectural decisions in real time
  • Teams work with consistent, up-to-date guidance embedded in their daily tools

This isn’t just better documentation—it’s operational architecture. By making ADRs machine-consumable and embedding clear instructions, they become the single source of truth that powers both human understanding and automated enforcement.

The result? Development environments where architectural intent is always clear, actionable, and automatically aligned across every team member and tool.

Why Traditional ADRs Fall Short

The gap between architectural intent and daily practice is where most projects struggle. Traditional ADRs capture decisions brilliantly but fail to integrate them into the development workflow where they matter most.

  • Passive documentation: ADRs become historical artifacts that developers consult only during crisis or retrospectives—if at all.
  • Disconnected from automation: Build systems, linters, and AI tools operate independently of architectural decisions, missing opportunities to enforce standards automatically.
  • Onboarding friction: New team members must manually discover and interpret scattered decisions, slowing their ability to contribute effectively.
  • Inconsistent application: Without active reinforcement, even well-documented decisions gradually drift or get forgotten across different teams and projects.

Instruction by Design: From Records to Directives

The transformation begins when we stop thinking of ADRs as documentation and start treating them as executable specifications for both human and AI behavior.

  • Machine-consumable structure: Every ADR includes structured metadata and clear instructions that AI Code Assistant can parse and apply immediately.
  • Operational states with meaning: “Accepted” decisions become mandatory requirements, “proposed” become considerations, while “deprecated” and “superseded” trigger active avoidance patterns.
  • Direct workflow integration: Decisions automatically influence code suggestions, review processes, and validation pipelines without manual intervention.
  • Single source of truth: Both developers and AI agents reference the same authoritative guidance, eliminating interpretation gaps and ensuring consistent application.

The AI Enforcement Layer

When architectural decisions become machine-readable, they can drive intelligent automation throughout your development process:

## Decision References

* MUST document all decisions in `decisions/` folder using `templates/architecture-decision.md` format.
* MUST treat "accepted" decisions as mandatory requirements with highest precedence.
* MUST respect decision states:
  - **accepted**: mandatory requirements
  - **proposed**: optional considerations
  - **deprecated**: avoid in new implementations
  - **superseded**: forbidden, follow superseding decision instead
* MUST use the `instructions` frontmatter property as primary AI guidance for each decision.

These rules make every ADR actionable. Human or AI, your team always knows what matters most. Now the journey with your AI buddy begins with clear, actionable guidance. Without the day-to-day friction of interpreting static documents, your team can focus on what really matters: building great software.

The Enhanced ADR Template: Built for Action

The template itself is full of helpful instructions and required fields, for clarity and standardization:

<!-- List of authors who contributed to this decision. Include full names and roles if applicable. -->
authors:
- Name Surname <!-- Replace with actual name -->
- Another Name Surname <!-- Add more authors as needed -->

<!--
The patterns this decision applies to. Each entry is a glob pattern that matches files affected by this decision.
Example:
applyTo:
- "**/*.cs"          # Applies to all C# files
- "src/**/*.razor"   # Applies to all Blazor components in src folder
- "tests/**/*.sql"   # Applies to all SQL files in tests folder
-->
applyTo:
- "**/*" <!-- Replace with specific glob patterns -->

<!-- The date this ADR was initially created in YYYY-MM-DD format. -->
created: YYYY-MM-DD

<!--
The most recent date this ADR was updated in YYYY-MM-DD format.
IMPORTANT: Update this field whenever the decision is modified.
-->
lastModified: YYYY-MM-DD

<!--
The current state of this ADR. If superseded, include references to the superseding ADR.
Valid values: proposed, accepted, deprecated, superseded
-->
state: proposed

<!--
A compact AI LLM compatible definition of this decision.
This should be a precise, structured description that AI systems can easily parse and understand.
Include the core decision, key rationale, and primary impact in 1-2 concise sentences.
-->
instructions: |
  Compact definition of the decision made and its core purpose.
  Key rationale and primary impact on the project or development process.
---
<!-- REQUIRED: Filename MUST follow the format: YYYY-MM-DD-Title (replace all spaces with hyphens) -->
# Title <!-- A concise title that summarizes the decision. Use a format like "Decision: [Short Description of Decision]". -->

<!--
A brief summary of the decision. This should be a short paragraph that captures the essence of the decision made.
-->

## Context

<!--
Provide a detailed explanation of the problem or issue that led to this decision. Include background information, constraints, and any relevant context to help readers understand why this decision was necessary.
-->

## Decision

<!--
Clearly state the decision made. Describe the chosen solution or approach in detail, including any specific technologies, tools, or methods involved.
-->

## Consequences

<!--
Explain the implications of this decision. What are the expected benefits, trade-offs, and potential risks? How will this decision impact the project or organization?
-->

## Alternatives Considered

<!--
List and describe other options that were considered. For each alternative, explain why it was not chosen. Include pros and cons, feasibility, and any other relevant factors.
-->

## Related Decisions (Optional)

<!--
Provide links or references to other ADRs that are related to this decision. Explain how they are connected and why they are relevant.
Use markdown link syntax to reference other decisions: [Decision Title](./YYYY-MM-DD-decision-filename.md)
If there are no related decisions, this section may be omitted or include a note stating "None at this time."

Example:
- [Centralized Package Version Management](./2025-07-10-centralized-package-version-management.md) - Related because this decision impacts how we manage dependencies
- [Conventional Commits](./2025-07-10-conventional-commits.md) - This decision affects our commit message format which impacts versioning
-->

Why this structure matters:
Every field drives your team toward actionable clarity. No more vague rationale, ambiguous decisions, or documentation drift. The template itself becomes machine-readable—AI Code Assistant can parse every element directly, while humans get the structure they need to make consistent, enforceable decisions.

Concrete Example: English as Project Language

Let’s see how this works with a real, high-impact example.

authors:
- Jane Doe, Solution Architect
- John Smith, Lead Developer
applyTo:
- "**/*"
created: 2025-07-15
lastModified: 2025-07-15
state: accepted
instructions: |
  Establish English as the mandatory language for all code, documentation, comments, commit messages, and written content to ensure consistency and global accessibility.
  Applies to all identifiers, configuration files, database objects, and communication using clear, professional English standards.
---
# Decision: English as Project Language

All project artifacts, including code, docs, configs, database objects, and commit messages, must use clear, professional English. This enables global collaboration, faster onboarding, and consistent reviews—by both people and AI.

## Context

Fragmented language use has slowed down onboarding, increased misunderstandings, and made collaboration harder across regions. A single language standard solves these problems.

## Decision

All content—code, comments, documentation, configs, and communication—must be in English, using clear and professional standards.

## Consequences

**Benefits:**
- Global teams onboard faster and communicate better
- Automated tools and AI Code Assistant can parse, review, and generate content reliably
- Fewer mistakes, less rework, and smoother audits

**Trade-offs/Risks:**
- Non-native English speakers may need support
- Existing teams may need time to adapt

## Alternatives Considered

- Local language flexibility: Increased confusion and audit risk
- Bilingual documentation: High maintenance, likely to get out of sync

## Related Decisions

- [Centralized Documentation Standards](./2025-07-10-centralized-documentation-standards.md)

This ADR is a perfect example of Instruction by Design. It’s not just a record of a decision; it’s a directive that shapes how your team works every day. By specifying that all project artifacts must be in English, it sets clear expectations for both human developers and AI Code Assistant.

It eliminates ambiguity, reduces friction, and ensures that everyone—regardless of their native language—can contribute effectively.

Why This Matters

This ADR is more than just a decision; it’s a standard that your team can rely on. It’s clear, actionable, and enforceable. By using this template, you ensure that every architectural decision is not only documented but also actively shapes your development process.

It’s a living document that evolves with your project, guiding both human and AI agents toward consistent, high-quality outcomes.

How AI and Automation Put This to Work

With Instruction by Design, your ADRs become living documents that AI Code Assistant can use to guide development. Here’s how it works in practice:

  • Automatic code and docs checks:
    AI Code Assistant flag any non-English content and suggest improvements in real time. Always considering the ADRs as the source of truth.

  • Guided pull requests:
    Every reviewer can refer to the ADR for clear, objective decisions. Without friction, they can align on expectations and requirements quickly.

  • Fast onboarding:
    New developers and AI agents see the language policy immediately—and know it’s enforced.

The Bigger Picture: Operationalizing Architecture

Instruction by Design is about more than just better ADRs. It’s about operationalizing architecture—making your architectural decisions active participants in your development process. By embedding clear, actionable instructions into every ADR, you create a system where architectural intent is always clear, enforceable, and aligned with your team’s daily work.

This approach transforms ADRs from passive records into active guides that shape both human and AI behavior. It ensures that every decision is not just documented but also operationalized—driving consistent, high-quality outcomes across your development teams.

Benefits of Instruction by Design

  • Consistency: Every team member and AI agent follows the same standards, reducing drift and confusion
  • Clarity: Clear, actionable instructions eliminate ambiguity and ensure everyone knows what’s expected
  • Automation: AI Code Assistant can enforce decisions in real time, catching issues before they become problems
  • Evolution: As projects grow, ADRs evolve with them—ensuring that architectural intent remains clear and actionable

Conclusion: Transform Your ADRs Today

Instruction by Design is a game-changer for how we think about architectural decision records. By transforming ADRs into actionable, AI-ready guidance, we bridge the gap between architectural intent and daily practice. No more passive documentation—now your ADRs actively shape how your teams work, ensuring consistency, clarity, and quality across every project.

Don’t just document. Operationalize. - Turn your ADRs into active guides for your people and your tools—because real progress comes from decisions you actually use. Ready to transform your ADRs?

Comments

VG Wort